There is no such thing as perfect life.
Living here on Earth consists of ups and downs, and full of
uncertainty. We do not know exactly what will happen later, tomorrow,
next week, next month, next year, and so on. All people also live
through problems such as financial problems, problems in love,
problems in life, problems in school, problems in health, and a lot
more. We can't run away forever without facing our problems. And of
course, we have to face and solve these problems so that our life can
go on smoothly. We solve these by elevating our limited observations
and our plausible opinions to the level of sure facts and infallible
conclusions.
The main character of Detective Conan
named Shinichi Kudo who was transformed to a kid with a pseudonym of
Conan Edogawa solves a lot of complicated criminal cases. He solves
these by using deductive reasoning or simply deduction.
According to Harvey Bluedorn who wrote
an article about "Two Methods of Reasoning" in the website triviumpursuit, deductive reasoning moves from general to the particular. It works
from a general premise to a more specific conclusions. It is a lot
different from inductive reasoning because induction works the other
way, moving from specific observations to broader generalizations and
theories. The two methods of reasoning have a very different
processes in conducting a research and yield distinctive results.
Living here in 20th century,
I am somehow aware of how 20th century generation people
solve uncertainty about certain knowledge or information. Twentieth
century generation people, just like Conan Edogawa, do some
researches and evaluate concrete observations in answering and in
deciding assumptions. I got curious about how early philosophers and
thinkers come up with their conclusions about certain knowledge. And
I found this article entitled "Deductive and Inductive Reasoning" by Andrew at the website articlesbase. According to this article, the issue about
certain knowledge or fact is traced back to Aristotelian logic.
Aristotle's works are the oldest known official studies of knowledge
that were ever found that still share a lot of common with current
theory of logic.
"Aristotle's subject of logic
progresses essentially around deduction." - Andrew
The most important scientific law of
deductive reasoning is the assurance that our assumptions or
hypotheses about a topic of interest can be guaranteed if it is
resulting from necessity. To make sure that the deductions work, the
result, which is the necessity, follow the circumstances or the
basis, which is the premise.
It is really amazing that people can
conduct such reasoning either deductive or inductive. I just wander
if animals can also do reasoning like humans in order for them to
survive. I saw this article "Study Shows that Monkeys Can Do Deductive Reasoning" written by Mike Adams. I found this at the
website naturalnews. According to this article, Jonathan Flombaum who is a
graduate student in the Psychology Department at Yale University and
colleague Assistant Professor Laurie Santos did the test to assess
the visual perspectives of others. They did this by initiating two
experiments that all involved a human holding a grape next to a
curios monkey. For the first experiment, the human grape holder stood
either facing or turned away from monkey. And for the final
experiment, the human held up a small rectangular cut-out that
blocked either the human's eyes or his mouth. The conclusion of their
experiment stated that monkey can really do deduction.
"Monkeys can deduce what other
monkeys and humans think, want and see based on visual clues." -
Mike Adams
Just by seeing the title of the
article, I really got interested and I am surprised that monkeys can
really do deductions just like humans. And the other thing is that
the research about monkeys helps other researchers and scientists to
learn more about autism among people.
To sum all up, I have learned that with
the application of a little logic, rationality and observation, we
can solve problems in our own lives without resorting help from
others. Just like in Conan Edogawa's adventure together with the most
complicated criminal cases turns out in the end to have an absurdly
simple solution.
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento